Something Smells Phishy - Fake IRS Refund Emails

I just received an email with the following text (albiet in my spam filter).

After the last annual calculations of your fiscal activity
we have determined that you are eligible to receive
a tax refund under section 501(c) (3) of the
Internal Revenue Code. Tax refund value is $120.50.
Please submit the tax refund request and allow us 6-9 days
in order to IWP the data received.
If u don't receive your refund within 9 business
days from the original IRS mailing date shown,
you can start a refund trace online.

If you distribute funds to other organization, your records must show wether
they are exempt under section 497 (c) (15). In cases where the recipient org.
is not exempt under section 497 (c) (15), you must have evidence the funds will
be used for section 497 (c) (15) purposes.

If you distribute fund to individuals, you should keep case histories showing
the recipient's name and address; the purpose of the award; the maner of
section; and the realtionship of the recipient to any of your officers, directors,
trustees, members, or major contributors.

To access the form for your tax refund, please click here


This notification has been sent by the Internal Revenue Service,
a bureau of the Department of the Treasury.

Of course, the email is fraudulent (not to mention nonsense), and anyone foolish enough to follow the link and enter in the requested financial information will most likely find their identity and their money stolen.  Beware!

Update Your Beneficiary Designations

Failure to update one's beneficiary designations for life insurance, annuities and retirement accounts is all too common.  One of the more common problems stems from not changing beneficiary designations after a divorce.  The law does not automatically cancel beneficiary designations in favor of a former spouse.  This can cause a major disruption of one's estate plan, have unintended tax consequences and create conflict among family members.

Earlier this month the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont Savings.  This case involves a deceased father who never changed his retirement plan beneficiary after his divorce, and has pitted daughter against mother (the ex-wife).

Here is an excerpt from the Legal Information Institute Bulletin at Cornell University Law School:

"[T]he Supreme Court will determine whether a divorcing spouse must obtain a Qualified Domestic Relations Order to waive the right to receive an ex-spouse's pension benefits under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"). A decision upholding the Fifth Circuit will make Qualified Domestic Relations Orders ("QDRO") the only method by which an ex-spouse can waive rights to pension plan benefits, while a reversal would permit voluntary non-qualified waivers as well. In either case, the Supreme Court's decision will impact pension plans, their employee plan members, and beneficiaries. "

 

Other common problems are naming minor children as beneficiaries, or not naming a new spouse if such is desired.

So, please check all of your beneficiary designations, and update them if necessary.  If you have any questions about the best way to handle the designations, consult with an estate planning attorney.  And finally, make sure that your designations are acknowledged by the institution!

 

ILIT Trustees - Examine Your Policies

Life insurance trusts (ILITs) are a popular estate planning technique used to shelter life insurance proceeds from estate taxes, creditors and mismanagement by beneficiaries. While the insured is alive, generally the only asset of an ILIT is the life insurance policy.  However, ILIT trustees have a duty to make sure that the policy is a sound investment, and may be liable to the beneficiaries if it is not.

So, for ILITs that have owned the same policy for several years, the trustee should ask the following questions:

  • Is the policy performing as illustrated?  If the policy was obtained when interest rates were high, the initial illustration probably assumed a relatively high interest rate for the life of the policy.  However, in the last several years, interest crediting rates for universal life and participating life dividends have been lower.  Market downturns have also adversely affected the performance of variable products.  Failure to address this issues could cause polices to lapse.
  • Is the policy sufficient for current needs? Changes in the insured lfe and beneficiaries lives, along with changes in estate tax and other laws, may make adjusting the death benefit advisable.
  • Is there a more competitive policy available? Life insurance rates on similar policies tend to drop over time.  Longer life expectancies, lower mortality costs, and improvements in underwriting all contribute to lower current costs.
  • Do newer policies offer better features? Limited guaranteed policies are now available, along with riders for return of premium, accelerated death benefits,  and long term care benefits.
  • Is the insurance company financially strong?  Life insurance companies are rated for financial strength and stability by ratings services such as Moody's A.M. Best , and Standard and Poors.  Is your carrier's ratings decline significantly, consider switching to a stronger company.

Have an insurance professional conduct a few on the policy every few years to make sure that you are fulfilling your fiduciary duty and reducing the risk of future legal action by beneficiaries.

Warren Buffet - Now's the Time to Buy American Stocks

Words of wisdom from a sage investor on the NY Times Website.

It is also important not to use the poor economy as an excuse to neglect protecting what you have by doing sound estate planning.  If you have less, aren't protections against creditors, mismanagement and taxes even more important than when you're flush?

 

 

Free Webcast on Aging October 30, 2008

The National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys (NAELA) will be offering its first ever public Webcast on October 30, 2008.  Aging in America: How to Plan for it is a one-hour roundtable discussion program video recorded and broadcast "live" via the Internet.  Streamed at NAELA.org on October 30 at 1:00 pm ET, the free Webcast will be moderated by AARP's Wil Stoner and include NAELA panelists Bernie Krooks and Ron Fatoullah.

Click here for free registration.
 

IRS Announces Pension Plan Limits for 2009

IR-2008-118, Oct. 16, 2008

WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service today announced cost‑of‑living adjustments applicable to dollar limitations for pension plans and other items for tax year 2009.

Section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code provides for dollar limitations on benefits and contributions under qualified retirement plans. It also requires that the Commissioner annually adjust these limits for cost‑of‑living increases.

Many of the pension plan limitations will change for 2009 because the increase in the cost-of-living index met the statutory thresholds that trigger their adjustment. However, for others, the limitation will remain unchanged. For example, the limitation under Section 402(g)(1) on the exclusion for elective deferrals described in Section 402(g)(3) is increased from $15,500 to $16,500. This limitation affects elective deferrals to Section 401(k) plans and to the federal government’s Thrift Savings Plan, among other plans.

Effective Jan. 1, 2009, the limitation on the annual benefit under a defined benefit plan under Section 415(b)(1)(A) is increased from $185,000 to $195,000. For participants who separated from service before Jan. 1, 2009, the limitation for defined benefit plans under Section 415(b)(1)(B) is computed by multiplying the participant's compensation limitation, as adjusted through 2008, by 1.0530.

The limitation for defined contribution plans under Section 415(c)(1)(A) is increased from $46,000 to $49,000.

The Code provides that various other dollar amounts are to be adjusted at the same time and in the same manner as the dollar limitation of Section 415(b)(1)(A). These dollar amounts and the adjusted amounts are as follows:

  • The limitation under Section 402(g)(1) on the exclusion for elective deferrals described in Section 402(g)(3) is increased from $15,500 to $16,500.
  • The annual compensation limit under Sections 401(a)(17), 404(l), 408(k)(3)(C), and 408(k)(6)(D)(ii) is increased from $230,000 to $245,000.
  • The dollar limitation under Section 416(i)(1)(A)(i) concerning the definition of key employee in a top-heavy plan is increased from $150,000 to $160,000.
  • The dollar amount under Section 409(o)(1)(C)(ii) for determining the maximum account balance in an employee stock ownership plan subject to a 5‑year distribution period is increased from $935,000 to $985,000, while the dollar amount used to determine the lengthening of the 5‑year distribution period is increased from $185,000 to $195,000.
  • The limitation used in the definition of highly compensated employee under Section 414(q)(1)(B) is increased from $105,000 to $110,000.
  • The dollar limitation under Section 414(v)(2)(B)(i) for catch-up contributions to an applicable employer plan other than a plan described in Section 401(k)(11) or Section 408(p) for individuals aged 50 or over is increased from $5,000 to $5,500. The dollar limitation under Section 414(v)(2)(B)(ii) for catch-up contributions to an applicable employer plan described in Section 401(k)(11) or Section 408(p) for individuals aged 50 or over remains unchanged at $2,500.
  • The annual compensation limitation under Section 401(a)(17) for eligible participants in certain governmental plans that, under the plan as in effect on July 1, 1993, allowed cost‑of‑living adjustments to the compensation limitation under the plan under Section 401(a)(17) to be taken into account, is increased from $345,000 to $360,000.
  • The compensation amount under Section 408(k)(2)(C) regarding simplified employee pensions (SEPs) is increased from $500 to $550.
  • The limitation under Section 408(p)(2)(E) regarding SIMPLE retirement accounts is increased from $10,500 to $11,500.
  • The limitation on deferrals under Section 457(e)(15) concerning deferred compensation plans of state and local governments and tax-exempt organizations is increased from $15,500 to $16,500.
  • The compensation amounts under Section 1.61‑21(f)(5)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations concerning the definition of “control employee” for fringe benefit valuation purposes is increased from $90,000 to $95,000.  The compensation amount under Section 1.61‑21(f)(5)(iii) is increased from $185,000 to $195,000.
  • The limitation on wages under Section 45A regarding individuals eligible for the Indian employment credit is $40,000 for tax years beginning in 2008 and will increase to $45,000 for tax years beginning in 2009. The termination date of section 45A was recently extended from Dec. 31, 2007, to Dec. 31, 2009, by Section 314 of Division C of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, P.L. 110-343.

Continue Reading...

Gift Tax Annual Exclusion to Increase in 2009

The IRS has announced many annual inflation adjustments for 2009, including an increase in the annual gift exclusion.

The annual gift tax exclusion for present interest gifts will be $13,000.

The annual exclusion for present interest gifts to a non-citizen spouse will be $133,000.

As I previously reported, North Carolina will no longer have a gift tax starting in 2009.

Click "Continue Reading" for the full text of Revenue Procedure 2008-66.


 

Continue Reading...
Tags:

Using a Professional Care Manager

Services from care managers should be something that every family takes advantage of, but in reality very few families use them. Care managers could go a long ways towards helping the family find better and more efficient ways of providing care for a loved one.

The concept is simple. The family hires a professional adviser to act as a guide through the maze of long term care services and providers. The care manager has been there many times. The family is experiencing it usually for the first time.

 

Continue Reading...

Should You Roll Your 401(k) Over into an IRA?

Once you cease working for an employer, you have the option of rolling over to an Individual Retirement Account (IRA) any retirement plan (such as a 401(k)) established for you while employed.

In most cases, it is beneficial to do such a rollover because of the advantages offered by an IRA.  However, in certain cases it might make sense to leave the funds in the original account.  Read on:

Advantages of IRAs:

  • Early retirement choices - Unlike in a 401(k), penalty-free withdrawals may be had from an IRA before age 59 1/2 under the "substantially equal periodic payments" rule.  This rule allows an account owner to make withdrawals of a specific amount over the longer of a period of five years or until attaining age 59 1/2.
  • More favorable beneficiary options - Some employer sponsored plans require non-spouse beneficiaries to take withdrawals from the plan over a five year period, lessening the opportunity for tax-deferred growth and triggering more income tax.  With IRAs, non-spouse beneficiaries may "stretch" withdrawals over their lifetimes, creating tremendous growth potential for younger beneficiaries.
  • Penalty-free withdrawals - With IRAs, these are allowed for higher-education expenses and first-time home buying.  Not so with employer plans.
  • Greater investment choices - Some employer plans have limited investment options, and only one account is permitted.  IRAs offer much more freedom in choosing investments, and different accounts with different investment strategies (and/or beneficiaries) may be set up.
  • Fee payment options - IRA administrative fees may be deducted from the account, or may be paid from non-retirement funds.  The latter type of payments, which are not allowed in employer plans, are deductible as a miscellaneous itemized deduction.

Advantages of Employer Plans:

  • Reduction of capital gains in company stock - company stock moved out of a 401(k) into a non-retirement account is taxed based on the value of the stock when purchased, rather than the date of transfer.  If the stock is first moved to an IRA, this tax break is not available.
  • Penalty-free withdrawals at age 55 - employees who cease employment at 55 (or anytime before 59 1/2) can take penalty-free withdrawals starting immediately.  Except for the substantially equal periodic payments rule, IRA account owners must wait until 59 1/2.
  • Avoidance of North Carolina income taxes - Certain retired government workers can claim an exemption from state income for their retirement plan payments.  If the account was rolled over into an IRA, the exemption would not be available.

 

FDIC Bank Account Insurance Coverage Calculator

The recent Bailout law increased the FDIC insurance coverage for bank accounts to $250,000 per person, per bank.  However, different types of accounts, such as joint, POD, etc. affect how the coverage is calculated.  The FDIC provides this handy calculator to estimate the coverage available to you for your accounts at each bank.

More on Special Needs Trusts

I recently posted a link to an article on Special Needs Trusts - here's another one from the Wall Street Journal, which quotes several well known lawyers, including Barry Nelson in Miami, who has a special needs child himself.

What Property is Exempt from Creditors' Claims in NC?

If you were ever to be sued, what property would be protected in the event of a judgment against you?

Homestead - only $18,500 of the value of your home.  If you are over 65 and your deceased spouse (or significant other, etc.) was an owner of the home also, the amount protected is $37,500.

Tenancy by the Entirety property - real estate owned by a husband and wife is protected against creditors of either spouse (but not joint creditors),

ERISA Retirement Accounts - 401(k)s, 403(b)s, 457 plans are protected by federal law.

IRAs - protected by NC law.  Protection of IRAs rolled over from ERISA plans is limited to $1 million in bankruptcy.  Inherited IRAs do not necessarily have the same protection, at least in bankruptcy.

Life Insurance - proceeds payable to a beneficiary are protected from creditors of the policy owner provided the beneficiary is not the owner or the insured.

Tangible Personal Property - vehicles are protected up to $3,500 and household furnishings up to $5,000.

529 College Savings Plans - protected up to $25,000.

For details, see NCGS Section 1C-1601.  As you can see, beyond retirement accounts these protections are minimal and do not substitute for adequate liability insurance and proper asset protection planning.  In addition, these same exemptions do not apply to Medicaid eligibility for nursing home care, which has a completely different set of rules.  Retirement accounts are NOT exempt for Medicaid purposes.

Estate and Income Tax Reduction Strategies in a Bear Market

 1) If you are not selling options or using margin trading, you should revoke your margin agreements.  This reduces your risk by ensuring that your securities are not lent.

 2) Roth IRA conversions should be aggressively reviewed.
 
3) Loss Harvesting, while remaining in the market should be reviewed.
 
4) For now, if you have over $100,000 in one bank you should consider using several banks.
 
5) GRATs to freeze (for tax purposes) the value of depressed stocks should be implemented.
 
6) Large gains should be taken under the 15% tax rate compared to a higher future tax rate.
 
7) Tax efficient asset allocation between Roth's, Qualified Plans and outside accounts should be reviewed.
 
8) Parents should aggressively gift and sell closely-held business interests to trusts for children and Grandchildren.
 
9) Taxable Gifts, incurring a gift tax, will in vogue under a new administration.
 
10) Oil and Gas will continue to provide tax and financial planning opportunities.
 
11) Have an expert review all life insurance policies.
 
12) Consider funding dynasty trusts today ($2,000,000) and on January 1, 2009 ($1,500,000).
 

 From Bob Keebler, CPA

 

Bailout Includes IRA Charitable Rollover

The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (H.R. 1424) passed the House yesterday, and was quickly signed by President Bush.  The law includes an extension of the IRA Charitable Rollover, which allows individuals age 70 and older to transfer up to $100,000 per year to public charities, tax-free.  It is in effect for 2008 and 2009.


Capital Gain Limited for Former Vacation Homes

Effective January 1, 2009, the $250,000 capital gain exclusion ($500,000 for married couples) for sales of former vacation homes that become one's personal residence will be limited.  This posting by Charles Rubin provides a good explanation to the changes to IRC Section 121.

Top 10 Excuses for Failure to Plan One's Estate

Most folks never get around to doing any estate planning, even so much as a simple will.  Why?

  1. I'll do it later, when I'm "older."
  2. It costs too much.
  3. I don't like lawyers.
  4. I don't have time.
  5. It's too complicated.
  6. I don't have enough assets to worry about.
  7. I don't know whom to name as executor of my estate
  8. I don't know whom to name as guardian for my kids.
  9. I don't know how to find a good estate planning attorney.
  10.  I don't care.

My responses, bluntly:

  1. What happens if you never get "older."
  2. Compared to what?  The mess that will result from failure to plan?
  3. Then you haven't found the right one.
  4. Make time.  It's that important.
  5. Yes, sometimes, but a good estate planning attorney will be patient and provide explanations.
  6. Even if you own nothing, don't you care who will make decisions for you if you become incapacitated?
  7. Okay, the state will name one.
  8. Same as above.
  9. Ask friends, neighbors, colleagues, etc.  Check credentials and compare attorneys on the web.
  10. Then, my friend, you've truly stumped me.