IRS Allows Roth Conversions for Inherited Retirement Plans

In an unexpected announcement (Notice 2008-30), the IRS has stated that it will allow non-spouse beneficiaries of qualified plans (such as a 401(k), 403(b) or employer pension plan) to convert those funds directly to a Roth IRA. 

However, at least for the time being, beneficiaries of an IRA do not have this option.  Another issue is that the employer's plan must allow rollovers to a Roth, since they are not required to do so.

In most cases I recommend that employer plans such as 401(k)s be rolled over to IRAs when eligible, since IRAs generally offer better investment options and more liberal distribution rules.  In North Carolina IRAs are protected from creditors, at least for the original account owner, but this may not be true in all states.  Also, some states (not NC) offer Medicaid eligibility protection for qualified plans but not for IRAs.

The $100,000 income limitation for Roth conversions will disappear in 2010, and the tax due for the conversion can be paid in equal installments in 2020 and 2011.

Retiring? This Study May Make You Think Twice!

A Greek study reported this month in the American Journal of Epidemiology found that retired persons had a greater death rate than employed persons of the same age. 

That's good news for me, since with four kids to put through college, I'll be working a good, long time!

It would be interesting to see if the same thing holds true for Americans.  Having spent a couple of months in Greece during Law School, my experience is that in general Greeks are not nearly as work-obsessed as we Americans.

 

Congress Fails to Make Post-Death Non-Spousal IRA Rollovers Mandatory

I previously blogged that employers would be required to allow post-death non-spousal rollovers of their retirement plans to IRAs starting in 2008.  However, that did not come to pass:

This information is courtesy of attorney Phil Kavesh in California:

The IRS had previously announced that it would accept as part of the Technical Correction Bill to the Pension Protection Act of 2006 a provision that would require all corporate retirement plans to offer non-spouse beneficiaries a trustee to trustee lump sum rollover to an Inherited IRA, thereby allowing non-spouse beneficiaries to take advantage of RMD stretchout and avoid the one-year and five-year rules under most corporate retirement plans.

The Technical Corrections Bill recently passed did NOT include this provision and the IRS has decided not to move from its previous position that permitted each corporate retirement plan to decide whether or not to offer this rollover.  This development means that those with corporate retirement plans who have reached normal retirement age and can take an in-service distribution or have retired and left their money in the plan should consider rolling it out to an IRA now, so that non-spouse beneficiaries may take full advantage of RMD stretchout.  You may want to check the individual plan first, to see if it has been amended to allow the non-spouse rollover, as I anticipate that many plans will start to make this change over time.  If the plan has already made the change, a current rollover would not be necessary.  

For creditor, divorce and other protections for an inherited IRA, while still allowing the stretch, a standalone IRA/Retirement Plan Trust makes sense for most persons with retirement account values in excess of $200,000.  See my posting on IRA Trusts.

Avoid Probate of Equity Refunds from Continuing Care Communities

The Problem: Continuing care retirement communities have been growing in popularity with seniors for years.  Such communities usually require a "buy-in" upon admittance and many provide for a refund of a portion of the fee upon death.  The contracts (often called Residence and Care Agreements or the like) generally provide that the refund will be paid to the estate of the resident.  The trouble with this is that the refund triggers probate even if there are no other probate assets.  Since the refunds are often hundreds of thousands of dollars, unnecessary probate fees of $1,000 or more often result.

The Solution:  For those residents with living trusts, this can be avoided by a simple amendment to the Residence and Care Agreement that provides that the refund will be paid to the resident's living trust rather than his or her estate.  The amendment (or addendum, as some facilities call it) must be signed by the resident and the management of the facility.

For those residents without living trusts, the cost of having a trust prepared will generally be at least equaled by the probate cost savings alone, not to mention time and trouble avoided by escaping probate.

IRS to Require Retirement Plans to Offer Non-Spousal Rollovers to IRAs

Beginning in 2008, retirement plans (such as 401(ks) must allow non-spouse beneficiaries to roll over to an IRA.  The following is from Ed Slott, CPA:

The Pension Protection Act of 2006 included a provision that would permit non-spouse plan beneficiaries to do direct transfers from the plan to a properly titled inherited IRA and take stretch distributions over their lifetimes instead of being subject to the harsh payout rules of most company plans. This provision became effective in 2007.

The purpose of the provision was to allow non-spouse plan beneficiaries the same ability to stretch post-death distributions over their lifetime as if they inherited from an IRA. That was the plan. But in January 2007, IRS issued Notice 2007-7 which stated that the provision was not mandatory for plans. This created confusion and controversy and took the wind out of sails of this provision. This was contrary to what Congress intended. Congress realized this and has proposed a technical correction to the law stating that the plans MUST allow the non-spouse direct rollover to an inherited IRA.

In light of the pending Congressional technical correction, IRS reversed its position and now says that the non-spouse rollover provision will be mandatory beginning in 2008. 

Click here for the posting on the IRS website.

Baby Boomers to Start Taking Social Security in 2008

The first of the baby boomers can begin taking early Social Security payments in January 2008 as they turn age 62.  More than half of those eligible are expected to take early retirement.  This article in USA today is full of facts and figures about Social Security, including the bleak predictions about the future of the program.  As one of the youngest baby boomers, I certainly hope it's around in 20 years for me!

2008 Pension Limits Announced by IRS

Maximum deferral limits for 401(k) and 457 plans remain at $15,500.  The limit for defined contribution plan increases to $46,000, while the SIMPLE limit is $10,500.  See IRS News Release IR-2007-171 for full details.

Retirement Accounts and Income Taxes vs. Estate Taxes

This posting provides a brief explanation of the advantages and disadvantages of funding a Family Trust (aka Bypass or Credit-Shelter Trust, or Trust B) with an IRA or other retirement accounts.

The Family Trust, as contained in a Will or Living trust, is designed to hold assets of the first spouse to die, up to the amount of the federal estate tax exemption (currently $2 million). It provides support to the surviving spouse, and when the surviving spouse dies, the value of the Family Trust is not included in his or her taxable estate. This plan can save $1 million or so in estate taxes for couples with estates of $4 million and up.

Because of the fact that income taxes have to be paid on distributions from a retirement plan, funding a Family trust with a retirement plan, while advantageous from an estate tax standpoint, can be disadvantageous from an income tax point of view.

If estate taxes are not an issue, the best way to handle a retirement plan is to leave it outright to a spouse, who can then roll it over into an IRA. The spouse can then name the children to received the account at his or her death, and the children can use their life expectancies to take distributions, allowing a "stretch" of the benefits. This allows more tax-deferred growth.

However, if estate taxes are an issue, it is often advisable to have the retirement account paid to the Family Trust, which will allow the account to escape estate tax at the surviving spouse's death. If the trust is designed properly, the survivor's life expectancy is used for purposes of taking distributions, and after the survivor dies, the children will receive the retirement benefits. However, since the trust owned the account rather than the surviving spouse, no further stretch is allowed, so the children must take out distributions over the deceased spouse's remaining life expectancy per IRS tables. (e.g., at age 80, 10 more years or so, as opposed to about 35 years for a 50 year old child.) This means that the income taxes must be paid over a much shorter time period and not as much tax-deferred growth can occur.

The loss of tax-deferred growth is generally worthwhile, however, since the estate tax rate is about 50%, when NC estate tax is added to the 45% federal rate.

 In addition to arranging the beneficiary designation correctly, the Family Trust must include special provisions to help ensure the best income tax treatment for retirement plans payable to the trust.

What I advise many clients to do is name the spouse as the first beneficiary, the Family Trust as the second beneficiary, and the children, or their trust shares, as the third beneficiary. At the time of the first spouse's death, the survivor can then decide which option makes the most sense at that time, based on the current value of the couple's assets and the tax laws then in effect. In the event of simultaneous death, the children will be able to avail themselves of the stretch based on their ages.

 

For large retirement accounts, over $200,000 or so, I generally recommend a Standalone IRA Trust, which can be used for IRAs and other retirement plans.

This is a very complicated area of the law, so you should always consult an estate planning attorney to determine the best way to structure your retirement account beneficiary designations.

Why Establish an IRA Trust?

In 2005 a Private Letter ruling was issued by the IRA approving a specially designed "IRA Trust" that offers maximum protection and flexibility while allowing the beneficiaries to "stretch" their shares of the IRA over their life expectancies.  The IRA Trust can also be used for employer provided retirement plans, such as 401(k)s, 403(b)s, 457 Plans, etc.

Having spent a great deal of time studying the IRA distribution rules and the advantages of using an IRA Trust, I am now recommending them to just about every client whose retirement account balance exceeds $200,000.

 

Continue Reading...

IRA Expert Ed Slott Recommends Standalone IRA Trusts

I recently attended a two day seminar by nationally recognized IRA expert Ed Slott, CPA.  If the protection of a trust for IRA beneficiaries is desired, Slott says that the best way is to have the IRA paid to a Standalone IRA Trust.  He cautions that IRAs should not be mixed with non-IRA assets.

Slott also recommends that for married couples, spouses with large IRA balances should use the distributions to pay for life insurance to be held in trust for the other spouse, and then make the children (or a trust for their benefit) beneficiaries of the IRA.  This leverages funds that are subject to income and possibly estate tax into completely tax-free monies, and provides optimum "stretching" of the IRA, allowing maximum growth.  I think this strategy should be used for any couple with large IRA(s) and a total estate exceeding $2 million.

Young Boomers Prefer North Carolina for Retirement

Of baby boomers born between 1956 and 1964 who plan to move to another state after retirement, the top intended destination is North Carolina, according to a Harris Interactive Study (Polte Homes - Baby Boomer 2005).  14% of those surveyed said they planned to move to NC, beating out Florida, Arizona and California.

Based on my observations, the areas in North Carolina that seem to be most popular as retirement destinations are Chapel Hill and Pittsboro, Hendersonville, Wilmington, Brunswick County, and Moore County.