Trust Protectors in North Carolina Trusts

North Carolina recently expanded its law regarding trust "power holders," persons named in a trust, other than trustee, who are given certain powers over the trust and/or trustee.  Traditionally, such power holders have been called "trust protectors."  What follows is a brief discussion of the use of trust protectors, particularly with regard to North Carolina trusts.

I.          Introduction to the use of Trust Protectors. A Trust Protector (hereinafter, “TP”), sometimes referred to as a Trust Advisor, is a person appointed in the trust instrument to direct or limit the trustee with regard to the administration of the trust, and granted certain powers to add flexibility and control over an irrevocable trust. 

a.       Offshore. The concept of TP came about in the use of (primarily asset protection) trusts on offshore jurisdictions, where grantors may have been uncomfortable about entrusting large amounts of wealth to a trust company on a distant island. TPs were typically given the power to remove and replace trustees and change the situs of trusts. 

b.       Domestic. Over the last decade or so, the use of TPs has become common in U.S. trusts, and the powers typically granted to TPs have expanded, so that many practitioners view the use of TPs as indispensable in most trusts. This is particularly true for generation-skipping or dynasty trusts, where the trust is expected to last for quite a long period of time.

 II.                Typical Powers of a Trust Protector

a.       Remove and replace trustees

b.       Change situs and governing law

c.       Amend trust

d.       Add powers of appointment

e.       Modify withdrawal rights

f.        Remove and add beneficiaries (may include grantor)

g.       Approve trust distributions

h.       Toggle grantor trust status

i.         Correct errors

j.         Direct investments

k.       Direct trustee

l.         Review and approve accountings

m.     Terminate trust

n.       IRA trust – toggle to accumulation trust

III.             North Carolina’s new “Power Holder” law – N.C.G.S. § 36C-8A-801 et seq.

a.       Power holder” - a person other than a trustee with power to take certain actions concerning a trust.

b.       Trust instruments may confer various powers as to investments, distributions, and other administrative matters on persons other than trustees. 36C-8A-802.

c.       Power holder is a fiduciary who must act in good faith, and is liable for any loss due to breach of fiduciary duty. Exceptions:

                                                               i.      Power to remove and appoint a trustee or power holder.

                                                             ii.      Power of appointment by a beneficiary. 36C-8A-803.

d.       A trustee has no duty to monitor, advise or consult with the power holder. Trustee does not have to give notice to beneficiaries regarding an action or inaction directed by the power holder.

e.       A trustee is not liable for following the direction of a power holder, or the power holder’s failure to provide consent. 36C-8A-804.

f.        Article 8A also contains provisions for:

                                                               i.      Compensation and reimbursement. Compensation must be approved by clerk unless otherwise provided in the trust.

                                                             ii.      Jurisdiction.

                                                            iii.      Accepting or declining appointment.

                                                           iv.      Powers of the trustee in absence of a power holder.

                                                             v.      Decisions by multiple power holders.

                                                           vi.      Resignation and removal of power holders.

IV.              Fiduciary or Nonfiduciary

a.       North Carolina law

                                                               i.      Default is fiduciary capacity.

                                                             ii.      Opt out – 36C-1-105(b) provides that the terms of a trust prevail, and does not contain an exception for the duty of a power holder to act in good faith (there is an exception that requires that a trustee always act in good faith). 

                                                            iii.      Assuming 36C-1-105(b) applies, it is crucial that the trust expressly state that the TP serves in a non-fiduciary capacity if that is desired.

b.       Grantor trust toggle issues

                                                               i.      The ability of a TP to toggle grantor trust status on and off may be attractive to a grantor. However, under IRC § 675(4)(c) (power to reacquire trust corpus by substituting other property of equivalent value), the power must be exercised without the approval or consent of any person in a fiduciary capacity. Thus, when a TP acting in a fiduciary power grants this power to the grantor, it seems likely that it would not result in grantor trust treatment.

c.       Liability. A fiduciary obviously has much more potential liability than a non-fiduciary, particularly under current NC law. However, a court could rule that a TP is a fiduciary notwithstanding trust language to the contrary. While indemnification language may not stand in the event of a lawsuit, practitioners should consider including it, even with non-fiduciary TPs.

V.              The Role of Trust Protectors

a.       Laypersons. Should be not related or subordinate to the grantor, as such might cause estate tax inclusion or loss of asset protection features. Lay persons will generally have to hire counsel for advice and assistance with duties.

 b.       Attorneys. While some may view it as a conflict of interest, drafting attorneys are often in the best position to serve as TP as they are more familiar with the grantor’s intent and goals. Attorneys who are not experts in trust and tax law will also probably need to hire

c.    Entities.  Most banks and trust companies will not serve as TP.  If a TP is acting in a fiduciary capacity, then law firms and other entities without state-granted trust powers are not eligible to serve.  In a non-fiduciary capacity, it may be permissible for a law firm to serve, but that could open up the firm to liability, despite any indemnification language.  Entities designed solely to serve as TP (in a non-fiduciary capacity) may be the best choice for continuity of existence and limitation of liability; an example is TrustProtector, LLC.

 

 

Changes in NC Recording Fees and Requirements

Effective October 1, 2011, fees for recording documents in North Carolina's 100 Registers of Deeds will increase:

  1. Deeds - $26.00 for up to 15 pages.  $4.00 for each additional page.
  2. Deeds of Trusts/Mortgages - $56.00 for up to 15 pages. $4.00 for each additional page.

Formatting changes include a reduction in acceptable side margins from one-half inch to one-quarter inch and acceptable font from 10 points to nine point.  For deeds and deeds of trust, the drafter's name (a law firm name suffices) must appear on the first page of the document.

Another change is that satisfaction of deeds of trusts or mortgages by presentation of the original instrument (marked "paid" or "satisfied" will no longer be available after September 30, 2011.  Creditors must submit a satisfaction record within 30 days of full payment of the obligation.

NFA Gun Trusts in North Carolina

North Carolina residents who want to own certain weapons regulated by the National Firearms Act should consider the advantages of an NFA Gun Trust specifically designed for use in North Carolina.

From NorthCarolinaGunTrustLawyer.com:

 

WHAT IS AN NFA TRUST?

NFA firearms (also called NFA weapons) are certain guns and accessories regulated by the National Firearms Act. They are sometimes called "Class 3 weapons." NFA firearms include all fully automatic and select fire weapons, short barreled rifles and shotguns and sound suppressors (silencers). NFA firearms include things that you might not expect.

Example: Remember the Hi-Standard .22 Derringer? It's an ordinary garden variety pistol. Pair it with a wallet holster and it becomes an NFA weapon. Many collectibles, including pistols with detachable shoulder stocks, such as the Artillery Luger and the "Broomhandle" Mauser are also regulated by the National Firearms Act.

Suppose that your father brought home a "deactivated" machine gun from World War II? Even though these "Deactivated War Trophies" are welded up and are incapable of firing, they are still NFA weapons.

See NorthCarolinaGunTrustLawyer.com for more information.

 

Nevada Offers Estate Planning Advantages

North Carolina is not known for its attractive estate planning and asset protection laws, but NC residents can avail themselves of certain out-of-state planning strategies that can provide significant estate tax savings and creditor protection.  One state that has some of the most favorable laws is Nevada.

As a write this, I'm sitting in a hotel room in Las Vegas, having just finished up a meeting with nationally known estate planning and asset protection attorney Steve Oshins, whose office is located here.  Mr. Oshins, who is published frequently in Trust & Estates magazine and Estate Planning magazine, has developed several innovative trusts and trust-related strategies, such as the Megatrust, the Inheritors Trust and the Opportunity Shifting Trust

I have joined Mr. Oshins' Advanced Planning Legal Network to be able to bring these same types of techniques to my clients.

Click  "Continue Reading" for a brief description of the advantages of using Nevada laws for estate planning.

Nevada Estate Planning Strategies:

  • Limited Liability Company - Nevada has a law that limits the remedy of a creditor to a "charging order," and is otherwise attractive from an asset protection and estate tax planning standpoint.  Nevada also permits "Series" LLCs, which are bascially one main LLC with a "sub" LLC for each separate asset.  It provides the same protection as having a separate LLC for each asset, but avoids the additional cost and complexity of multiple LLCs.  As with all states, a local resident agent is required.
  • Dynasty Trust - Nevada now has a 365 year statute rule against perpetuities, which means that a trust can last for 10 generations or so.  In most states, including North Carolina, trusts can last for only about 100 years.  Keeping the assets in trust for a long period of time provides creditor protection and avoids estate tax for one's heirs, ensuring that even modest wealth ($1-2 million) can grow into a lasting legacy.  At least one trustee of the trust must be a NV resident or bank or trust company.
  • Asset Protection Trust  - Nevada law allows one to establish a trust for one's own benefit (called "self-settled trust) that is protected from most creditors after just two years.  Only a few other states allow such trusts, and these states require a longer period of time to elapse before the protection is effective.  Just like with a Dynasty Trust, a NV trustee is required.

Nevada also has no income or estate tax.

 

Incentive Trusts

Professor Joshua Tate of Southern Methodist University has published an interesting and informative article on Incentive Trusts, which are generally used by parents to try to shape the behavior of their children.  The abstract is as follows: 

This Article examines the contemporary phenomenon of incentive trusts: trusts that use money to encourage or discourage certain behaviors. Using evidence from Internet websites, practitioner articles, and newspaper articles, the Article considers the likely provisions that a typical incentive trust might have, and explains how such trusts might lead to a problem of inflexibility when they are not drafted so as to take into account the possibility of changed circumstances. The Article also examines current law regarding trust modification and termination as well as recent reform proposals, and suggests some alternatives that might better take into account the particular characteristics of incentive trusts.

The citation is: Tate, Joshua C., "Conditional Love: Incentive Trusts and the Inflexibility Problem" . Real Property, Probate and Trust Journal, Vol. 41, pp. 445-496, 2006 Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=873625